Joan Kane joins judging panel

NYC Dramaturg Joan Kane, Artistic Director for the Ego Actus theatre production company, has joined the judging panel for the competition! Fresh off a run of her play "Safe" at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival in Scotland, we are happy to have her keen and experienced eyes to help us choose our winning plays. Read more in today's press release:

Ego Actus Artistic Director Joan Kane Joins Judging Panel of Unchained Love Playwright Competition

Living in a marriage culture

Culture is to us how water is to fish - we are surrounded by it, but we often forget it's there. Once in a while though, it hits you like a riptide.

Consider these ads on teen pregnancy that currently can be seen in the New York Subway system:

What's interesting about these is how the word "marriage" is conjoined with the concept of permanence and stability, when the reality can be quite different.

In the first ad, marriage is positioned as a necessary step, along with education and employment, for avoiding poverty. Now, statistics may bear this out, but it's correlation, not causation. Education is (mostly) necessary to get a high-income job, and income is necessary to avoid poverty. But marriage, in and of itself, doesn't contribute income - unless you get spousal support in a divorce settlement. But the advice to get married before having children as a way to avoid poverty is full of assumptions. Consider these alternatives:

• "... get a job and don't have kids, you will avoid poverty"
• "... get a job and establish your career before having kids, you will avoid poverty"
• "... get a job and build a network of loving adults to support you, you will avoid poverty"
• "... get a job and win the lottery, you will avoid poverty."

All of those alternatives are just as true, yet marriage is the only solution offered. Even if you have children out of wedlock (a great word, by the way) you can get child support once paternity is proven - marriage is not a requirement.

The second ad is even more direct: "90% of Teen Parents Don't Marry Each Other." Any one of these alternative wordings would be more relevant to the actual impact on a teen's situation:

• Don't remain in a loving relationship with each other
• Don't raise their children together 
• Don't both financially support their children

The assumption is that if you're married, all of those other things will automatically fall in line, yet only the last one, because of child support laws, has any real truth to it.

I don't want people to think that I'm anti-marriage, but it would be nice if people weren't force-fed the idea that marriage should be a primary goal in life and the only safe way to have children without impoverishing themselves. Marriage, like many things, is great when it works, but lousy when it doesn't. That's probably why people go into it thinking it's going to last forever, because if it doesn't they will usually wish they'd never done it in the first place.

Bottom line: Marriage is a major legal change of identity status that should be weighed on its merits, not because our culture and society expects it. If, after giving careful thought to ALL the alternatives, that choice is right for you - then go for it. Just don't teach your kids that it's the only choice for them.

Post your thoughts in the comments - I'd love to hear what you think.